gEdit Color Themes

I’ve been using gEdit (the default text editor in Ubuntu) to do some Ruby and Ruby on Rails programming the last few weeks.  I was using the RadRails plugin for Eclipse but for some reason my computer slows down considerably when using Eclipse.  The thing is, gEdit comes with a couple of nice color themes by default but the darker Oblivion theme wasn’t quite to my liking.  So I a quick Google search later and I found a repository on GitHub that contains several nice gEdit color themes.  I’ve currently settled on the DarkMate them (see screenshot below).

So if you’re looking for some nice gEdit color themes, check out mig’s repository.

gedit-darkmate-theme

Click for full size

Posted in programming, Technology | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Internet Privacy, It’s a PUBLIC Internet Folks

Earlier this week, Google announced a new product called Google Buzz.  Google Buzz is one part Twitter, one part FriendFeed, and one part Wave.  Even more to the point, Buzz is Google’s entrance into the social media space.  This product launch isn’t without it’s uproar.  Like the uproars caused by a Facebook redesign/feature launch, Google Buzz as come under fire for privacy concerns.

Now, I’m the first to advocate privacy.  I think that you should never enter into something without understanding its impacts on your and information.  That being said, I’m also an avid user of social networks like Twitter, Facebook, Gowalla, and so on.  But I understand the implications on my privacy and look at how it’s handled once I’ve opened an account.  Google Buzz was no different.  They announced that you would automatically follow those you contact most via Gmail, it says so on the Google Buzz page.  So right off the bat, you know what’s going to happen.

That hasn’t stopped some people from having issues though.  Take this example here from the Fugitivus blog (warning: explicit language contained in post).  The person here was using Google Reader, a RSS subscription reader application from Google.  This is the part I want to focus mostly on for my point.

That point is, if you’re using an internet service, do not do something you wouldn’t want potentially shared with the world.  I think we can all agree, the internet is a mostly public forum.  Yes, there are walled services (like Facebook), but things happen, passwords get hacked, and companies make mistakes and privacy is destroyed (even if it’s only temporary).  Yes, one’s Google Reader sharing/notes/whatever should only go to those it’s intended.  But at the same time, caution must be maintained when doing something.  You wouldn’t send a questionable email out, because you never know where it might end up.  So why would you do something on a web application that you didn’t want seen by the public at large?  If you are going to use the internet, you have to accept some breakdown in privacy.  There is no such thing as a “PRIVATE INTERNET”.  My approach to internet privacy is this: “Don’t do anything you wouldn’t want seen by the public at large” – that’s it, no more or less.  If I don’t want the public knowing about it or fear that it might eventually see the light of day, well then I just simply don’t do it.

Now, before someone blankets me with a ton of statements about the blog post I linked to, let me note that I believe that the person has every right to be angry with Google, and I agree that Google Buzz needs to address many of its privacy concerns.  There are some issues that definitely need to be ironed out and I think Google will get it all sorted out.  In fact, Google has already announced some changes to Buzz’s privacy controls (it’s not a lot, but it’s a start).  Google released Buzz early and it is still very much a new product, but Google is good about the “release early, release often” (or at least they have been lately) so I think most of the major privacy issues will be resolved.

But let me just reiterate, it’s a public internet.  Even the walled sites eventually have cracks that let data out.  It’s going to happen.  So if your interested in keeping something under wraps, the internet is not the place to discuss it.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Internet Privacy, It’s a PUBLIC Internet Folks

Internet Privacy, It's a PUBLIC Internet Folks

Earlier this week, Google announced a new product called Google Buzz.  Google Buzz is one part Twitter, one part FriendFeed, and one part Wave.  Even more to the point, Buzz is Google’s entrance into the social media space.  This product launch isn’t without it’s uproar.  Like the uproars caused by a Facebook redesign/feature launch, Google Buzz as come under fire for privacy concerns.

Now, I’m the first to advocate privacy.  I think that you should never enter into something without understanding its impacts on your and information.  That being said, I’m also an avid user of social networks like Twitter, Facebook, Gowalla, and so on.  But I understand the implications on my privacy and look at how it’s handled once I’ve opened an account.  Google Buzz was no different.  They announced that you would automatically follow those you contact most via Gmail, it says so on the Google Buzz page.  So right off the bat, you know what’s going to happen.

That hasn’t stopped some people from having issues though.  Take this example here from the Fugitivus blog (warning: explicit language contained in post).  The person here was using Google Reader, a RSS subscription reader application from Google.  This is the part I want to focus mostly on for my point.

That point is, if you’re using an internet service, do not do something you wouldn’t want potentially shared with the world.  I think we can all agree, the internet is a mostly public forum.  Yes, there are walled services (like Facebook), but things happen, passwords get hacked, and companies make mistakes and privacy is destroyed (even if it’s only temporary).  Yes, one’s Google Reader sharing/notes/whatever should only go to those it’s intended.  But at the same time, caution must be maintained when doing something.  You wouldn’t send a questionable email out, because you never know where it might end up.  So why would you do something on a web application that you didn’t want seen by the public at large?  If you are going to use the internet, you have to accept some breakdown in privacy.  There is no such thing as a “PRIVATE INTERNET”.  My approach to internet privacy is this: “Don’t do anything you wouldn’t want seen by the public at large” – that’s it, no more or less.  If I don’t want the public knowing about it or fear that it might eventually see the light of day, well then I just simply don’t do it.

Now, before someone blankets me with a ton of statements about the blog post I linked to, let me note that I believe that the person has every right to be angry with Google, and I agree that Google Buzz needs to address many of its privacy concerns.  There are some issues that definitely need to be ironed out and I think Google will get it all sorted out.  In fact, Google has already announced some changes to Buzz’s privacy controls (it’s not a lot, but it’s a start).  Google released Buzz early and it is still very much a new product, but Google is good about the “release early, release often” (or at least they have been lately) so I think most of the major privacy issues will be resolved.

But let me just reiterate, it’s a public internet.  Even the walled sites eventually have cracks that let data out.  It’s going to happen.  So if your interested in keeping something under wraps, the internet is not the place to discuss it.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Internet Privacy, It's a PUBLIC Internet Folks

From Andy: Big Health Care Reform Should Start at the Bottom

Greetings,
As the Health Care debate around our country rages on, waxing and waning with each poll, I thought it was time to throw in some overlooked or outright discarded ideas. Bringing real access to health care to everyone without massive cost increases or symbolic coverage requires a total rethinking of how we do some things. Due to various regulations and liability issues as well as financial considerations most doctors now immediately after being in medical school go for specialty’s. Due to the cost of medical school and student loans it is not easy to make a livelihood as a doctor as a general practitioner of medicine. Now I realize that may be hard to believe due to prices that you are charged for going to a doctor but consider this first. Medical school can cost from 12-20K a year with books and other fees. This doesn’t include eating either. Now multiply that by 8 years to get a doctoral of medicine and you are looking at 96-160K in student loans cost. Don’t believe me google it and check. So you are fresh out of medical school with 100K in student loan debt. Now add whatever it costs to have a standard of living in your area. This puts most doctors out of medical school in a pretty big bind. Imagine having a house or apartment bill every month in student loans costs on top of all your bills. It doesn’t take much imagination to see why it is 50.00 or more just to see a doctor without insurance. Now add malpractice insurance to the equation. That can run from 20K to 200K depending on state and field the doctor is in. The point of all of this is we can pummel large health care companies as they are easy and in many ways justifiably part of the problem. But we are really only throwing a band aid on a gunshot wound if we don’t consider the entire system from college to hospital to managed care. So here are some suggestions or ideas for everyone to think about.
1.) Provide all or a portion of a pre-med students tuition to become a doctor up to General Practitioner with a few rules: they must maintain a suitable grade point average, depending on the level of financial help provided agree to work for a length of time at a government hospital facility or non-profit hospital for a standard wage, agree if they don’t maintain a proper grade point average or leave the position early they will be responsible for the loan or portion left that was given to them. If they fill the requirements they do not have to pay back the loan.

2.) Reform Malpractice laws. This can be done in a number of ways like setting a set percentage that lawyers can receive from winning a lawsuit while suing a doctor (in many cases lawyers take 40% area) to a realistic level, setting limits (reasonable) on how much a person could receive from a settlement ( I am in favor of this personally as long as the amount is fair and also if the injury or error causes permanent injury that the responsible party provides to have the costs of the injury for the duration of it.), reduce the timeframe that a patient can sue a doctor for an injury are all possible ways to do this.

3.) Streamline procedures involving medical practices and review them regularly with the heads of hospitals and doctors to ensure that the people doing the work are crafting the procedures.

4.) Enact Chargeback Rules. If you sue a doctor and your case is proven fraudulent or frivolous an award should be given to the doctor for the lost time and damage to his practice from the person accusing him.

5.) As lawyers have a rule that they must do a certain amount of pro bono work a year for people maybe adding in a rule of that nature may be worth looking at as well.

All of these ideas are just smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle but I haven’t read or heard of anyone in the “overhaul” of our health care mention anything close to this. We have spent so much time focusing on how big companies screw us we don’t or haven’t paid attention to how the actual doctor’s get pressured and screwed all the time. If we started with the fundamentals of health care at the bottom and worked up reforms may come in smaller packages but they would be real. Currently as it is we are trying to reform health care by replacing the board of a company not asking or listening to all the workers of that company what could be done to really change things for the better. Well writing about the entirety of the Heal care bill and debate would make a full time job I just wanted to throw in my two cents on it. See you all next time.

Posted in Commentary, From Andy | Tagged , | 9 Comments

mkoby.com Adds a New Writer

Tomorrow you will see a new post from a new author here on this blog.  The new author, Andy Snow, is a close personal friend of mine that I have known for many years (well over a decade at this point).  He is probably one of the smartest individuals I know, and can bring a lot to a discussion, including alternate viewpoints, new ideas, and just plain old debate.  Hopefully some of his ideas will bring open discussions to this website, and while I have always encouraged open debate on this blog I want to ask that it always remain civil (please, lets not be trolls).

Hopefully tomorrow’s post from Andy isn’t his last and we will see many more posts from him in the future.

Posted in Updates, Websites | Comments Off on mkoby.com Adds a New Writer

Book Review: Getting Real by 37signals

Getting RealA few weeks ago, I found 37signals’ book “Getting Real” online.  I had heard/watched DHH’s infamous “How to Make Money Online” presentation so the idea of a book written by the people at 37signals sounded interesting.  The cool thing is that you can read the entire book online, for free.  After reading about one third of it online I decided I need my own physical copy to keep on my bookshelf.  Seriously it’s that good.

If you are in the technology business and you work on web applications (or even non-web applications), you need to give “Getting Real” a good solid read.  It is filled with principles, that while might seem strange at first, are excellent rules to live by in this “Web 2.0” world.  The ideas of “underdoing your competition” and “release early and often” might seem strange in a business that has long believed in outdoing your competitors and waiting till the product is “perfect” (which can only be achieved with 10 managers, 50 developers, business analysts, and about 1,000 pages of useless documents) but in a place like the world wide web, mean little.

The main arguments presented in the book aim to keep things small, easily adaptable, simple, and even on occasion releasing crudely looking products (with the intent of cleaning up over time) are things that I have been discussing with a friend of mine for many years.  The book is in some ways an anti-big business book, and isn’t to be considered a rule book, but it is a game changer.  It’s ideas will cause some people to laugh, laud, and dismiss it entirely; for these people they will do so at their own peril.  This book causes one to think about an internet business in a different way.  It’s really not about the pumping up the stock option price so you can sell to Google, it’s about how to run a successful business on the internet so you don’t have to sell to some company with deep pockets.  It’s about starting and running a business and how (as a small company) you have an advantage over your larger competitors.

Overall I throughly enjoyed reading this book.  The essays are short (less than 2 pages in most cases), concise and get their point across quite well in their minimal space.  If you’re looking at doing web applications either in an existing company, or you are considering starting your own, this book is a “can’t miss” read.

Posted in Books | Tagged , | Comments Off on Book Review: Getting Real by 37signals