Consulting Consultants: Training

First off, I’m sorry about missing last week, I was busy and just didn’t get the article written in time.  Now, moving onto this week’s Consulting Consultants.

If you are a newcomer to the consultant market, you probably have figured out quite quickly that knowledge is power.  Not power as in the ability to boss others around but rather it power in the sense that the more you know, the further you will go.  So the general idea is to learn as much as you can.

Knowledge Routes

There are two distinct routes you can go (3 if you do a combination of the two) when it comes to knowledge: specialization or breadth.  Specialization is exactly what it sounds like in that you pick a technology or subject and you dive in deep.  You become the guru of that topic/technology/whatever.  If you go for breadth, you will now a little about a lot but not have much depth on anyone particular thing.  Some consider this a blessing while others might consider it a hindrance, and which one will largely depend on where or with whom you work.

Specialization

Specialization is great if you really love a specific technology.  If there is one thing that you specifically love doing, reading about, and keeping up with then it is probably a good idea to specialize in that.  Specialization is also great because you become the expert, the guru, the "go to guy" for any and all questions around your specialization.  A specialization is extremely helpful if there are a lot of people using a specific technology or product and need folks that know it well.  The reverse to that is, if you become specialized and that product goes away or becomes less popular, you are left with an a lot of knowledge about a product no one is using and thus you are now difficult to place or you find it hard to locate a contract for that specific product/technology.

The best way to specialize is to grab a book, subscribe to blogs, and simply play with the product/technology until you understand it inside and out.  For an example we’ll use Microsoft’s Sharepoint technology.  There are about a hundred books on the technology and Microsoft has it’s own blogs specifically from those that wrote, developed, and use the technology.  Microsoft also offers a Sharepoint virtual machine that anyone can download for free to try out and train on.  But the main point is, you read and absorb all you can on the specific focus you want to specialize in.

Breadth

Going for breadth leaves you with a similar problem.  You are hard to place because you know a little about a lot.  You might have a little more depth on certain products/technologies, but in general you are not an expert on any particular thing.  But don’t lose heart because know a little about a lot can help you understand why things work the way they do or better yet why one product or technology is better than another in a certain situation.  This can lead to what a colleague of mine refers to as the "Why Factor" (which we’ll discuss in this column at a later date).

When it comes to learning a little about a lot, you have a little more work to do than someone who is specializing.  You have to read, subscribe, and attend trainings as much as possible for as many products/technologies as possible.  So your RSS subscription list is going to get rather large.  However, the more you read and connect on, the more you will understand overall.  Sure you might not be able to dive deep into C++ code but you can probably look at it and understand what it is doing to some degree.  The idea here is to soak up as much as possible about as many things as possible.  This could result in information overload if you are not careful.

Combination

You can get the best of both worlds however.  If you can pick a specific technology that has a good chance of being around for a while (programming language with cross platform capabilities, for example) and learn as much as you can about that while at the same time reading about other products/technologies.  You can be placed on projects easily but still maintain that "why factor" understanding of how things work and why one might be better than the other.

The problem here is picking the product/technology (or multiples) to really dive into and become more specialized in.  That can be determined by seeing what the market needs and figuring out what products/technologies will more than likely stick around for a while.  So pay attention and do your research.

Posted in Consulting Consultants | Tagged | Comments Off on Consulting Consultants: Training

links for 2008-04-04

Posted in Daily Links | Comments Off on links for 2008-04-04

links for 2008-04-02

Posted in Daily Links | Comments Off on links for 2008-04-02

Will FriendFeed Help the Smaller Blogger

If you have been following professional blogger, Robert Scoble then you have probably hear that he has replaced Techmeme with FriendFeed as his homepage.  He claims that this is so he can see and hear the smaller voices of the blogging community and find the newest "superstars" since the blogging community has pretty much hit a gap in fresh voices.

Scoble’s correct when he says that the corporate blogger has taken over Techmeme.  Everyday it seems like the same publishers are getting their content on Techmeme throughout the day.  Sure, a smaller publisher might get lucky and lad on the front page, but its rare.  But what does it mean to say a blog is "corporate"?  Is TechCrunch corporate?  I think what Robert Scoble is refering to is the technology blogging elite.  Those people that get first rate access to new sites and new information.

Dave Winer mentioned something similar in his article, Proof That the End is Near, where he talks about the "tech industry superdelegates" and how he is unfollowing them on Twitter in hope to find the smaller voices as well.  It seems that some of the more popular people are looking for the smaller, most likely more original voices in the blogging industry.  No longer are they interested in what someone has to say about what TechCrunch, GigaOM, or even Mashable have to say anymore.  Well they might be interested, but they might move past the headline anymore.

So can FriendFeed help the smaller blogger?  If more people move to the "everybody" tab more frequently then there is that possibility.  If Techmeme and other such sites can utilize the comment system in FriendFeed to help determine the more popular stories, links, and such then it could help the lesser known bloggers become more known.  At least for a while anyway.  Once the more elite bloggers take over the space, it might become a useless practice.

One could utilize something like Yahoo Pipes to filter out the more elite bloggers when they start to move on the FriendFeed space.  But will the extra work be worth it?  Well that is something only time will tell.  I think that FriendFeed can help the smaller blogger become more popular if people are looking for new original voices (like me!).  But someone has to be looking for those people and link to them.  Forget the Pentiums, it’s all about the links.

Posted in Blogs, Technology | Comments Off on Will FriendFeed Help the Smaller Blogger

Adobe Releases AIR for Linux

Keeping good on their promise to bring their AIR platform to Linux, Adobe has released an alpha version of AIR for Linux today. This is great news for those looking to run AIR on their Linux desktops and Adobe should be commended for not slacking when it comes to getting AIR on Linux. Way to go Adobe!

edit: To read my opinions on Adobe AIR, be sure to check out my post: Why Adobe AIR is Important.

twhirl-linux

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Adobe Releases AIR for Linux

MacDaily News Misses the Point

Last week the website, MacDaily News, posted an article entitled, RIM’s BlackBerry 9000 Shows How Little They’ve Learned from Apple’s iPhone and proves that in a world where anyone can have an opinion, an uneducated opinion can really do a lot of harm.

You see the fact of the matter is, the iPhone is cool.  Everyone knows it and a lot of companies (like LG in particular) are working to catch up with the cool factor that has been generated by the iPhone.  The problem is, there is more to a phone than the cool factor.  There is adoption, there is the question of market, and there will always be the question of who’s next.  MacDaily News is incredibly quick to point out how lame the new BlackBerry 9000 is and how much it doesn’t improve on the existing product.  Fair enough, there is not a ton of innovation between the BlackBerry 8800 to the 9000 to warrant a jaw drop.  Also, they really focus on the saying things like:

"…but has not of the multi-touch goodness of the iPhone" and "It’s the same old, same old in an iPhone-inspired wrapper"

Maybe it is just me but I do not see this "iPhone-inspired wrapper" they speak of.  In fact I see something that is more in line with RIM’s previous offers than with the iPhone.  But RIM has a different market focus than Apple when it comes to mobile devices.

Research In Motion’s market?  The enterprise first and foremost.  Don’t believe, then just look at the fact that in almost every new BlackBerry release, it goes to the business side of provider first and the consumer side second.  The iPhone’s market?  Consumers and most specifically a younger generation of consumers at that.  Ask any older person what they want in a phone and more often than not you will hear, "I want to be able to make phone calls.  Taking a picture would be cool, but its not a requirement" and this is not Apple’s market.  The older generation could care less about the flashy interface of a device when it comes to actual use.  Sure they might say "wow that’s nifty" or have their eyes grow wide in awe of something new, but overall they don’t need it to live their daily lives.

So if Apple’s market is not the older generation (the large percentage of which controls/makes decisions in the enterprise world), Apple is not going to be selling to those folks.  Enterprise people want a phone that works and does what they need it to do.  The BlackBerry devices do that.  They work and they do it on an existing infrastructure that IT departments have spent years laying down.  The iPhone is not going to replace RIM in the enterprise anytime soon.  Enterprise folk are not looking to RIM to come out with an iPhone killer.  In fact most of them could care less as many of them are still on previous generation BlackBerry phones like the 8700.

Secondly, a touch screen is not everything.  In fact, every person that I know that has a touch screen device says the same thing with they pick up my Curve and use the trackball, "oooh, I like the trackball." or "wow this is a nice phone" so apparently a touch screen isn’t everything.  Multi-touch is a cool innovation and Apple should be commended for it as it really changes the way people interact with their phones and other devices.  But multi-touch is not going to completely replace existing navigation technologies.

Last but not least, MacDaily News needs to get a serious clue and stop drinking the Apple kool-aid.  I mean yes, Apple came out with some really cool stuff when it unleashed the iPhone on the masses but seriously, I have never read an article with so much fan-boyism in it.  Read up on technology, work in an enterprise IT, or something before you go off on things you apparently do not understand.  Nokia is not going anywhere, they allow interchangeable SIM cards, they offer some pretty nifty smartphone devices (not to mention they developed some of the first smart devices), and they’ve been on the 3G bandwagon for about as long as anyone can remember.  Microsoft is not going anywhere either.  They have market share and they continue to improve their mobile OS with each iteration.  I do not know how long LG will last, but as long as people need cheap devices, we’ll see a lot of them.  Seriously, the people at MacDaily News need to come out of the Apple induced haze and read up on other technologies because it’s articles like the one I linked to that really prove that some people really just have no idea what they are talking about.

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on MacDaily News Misses the Point