Consulting Consultants: Personal Branding – Social Networks

Last week, we took a look at blogging to improve your personal brand.  This week we’re going to look at an aspect of personal branding that still kind of new-ish and can help inform people as to who you are and what you do.  What is this thing of which I speak?  It’s social networks.

There are several social networks out there that can help you build your personal brand and bring you more networking opportunities.  The networks I’m specifically going to focus on are LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.

LinkedIn

When it comes to social networks, there are several spread out across the internet to help you become social in some way.  There are music social networks (Last.FM), there are movie social networks (Flixster), and there are ones for just general networking (Facebook).  The social network LinkedIn, is being marketed as “the social network for professionals.”  On LinkedIn, you can put up a pseudo-resume, give a little background information on your past jobs, and even talk about your interests as they relate to your career.  You can also connect to your co-workers both previous and current.  LinkedIn also offers a forum called Answers in which you can answer other peoples questions.  Answering questions can earn you points, and is a nice way to become known for something.  Think of this as an extension of your blog.  You can also use the questions as jumping points for your blog.

Some things you want to do to your profile page.  You want to be concise but you want to give people a good understanding of your past work.  This is similar to a resume so make sure it shines.  You’ll want to put up a photo (try to keep it as professional as possible).  You will also want to connect to as many people that you know as possible this will in turn bring others to you.  Finally shoot for 100% profile completeness, this will help give a nice overall view of yourself to those on the service.

How does this build your personal brand?  Well, this is a site for professionals to connect. and find each other.  If you make sure to list your skill sets accordingly people can find you when they need someone that does what you do.  It is also a place to brag about your accomplishments.  Have an MVP, a certification, or something else?  Make sure you say that on your LinkedIn profile.  Also, should you get laid off during this current economic crisis, you have a network of people you can ask to keep their eyes and ears open.

Facebook

Ahh Facebook, the “professional” Myspace.  Well maybe not really, but it does look more uniformed and is easier to look at than MySpace.  Facebook can arguably be interchanged with LinkedIn depending on where most of your network already connects.  If it’s on Facebook than you’re halfway there.  If it’s not, then Facebook is a good place to show the more personal side of yourself.  Facebook does allow you to have the best of both worlds in that you can create a really nice profile with little fluff and connect to your (former) co-workers.

When you fill out the information to show on your profile, you’ll want to be concise but also somewhat through.  This is because not just employers are going to be looking at this profile.  Chances are high that this profile will easily show up in a Google search for your name.  Fill in as much information as possible.  Avoid overly personal details but you can put things like phone numbers, relationship status, and some photos up.  Keep the photos neat and clean if you want to maintain the more professional profile.

Facebook gives a lot of options when it comes to securing your profile.  Make sure that if you do plan on putting stuff up that is professionally questionable that you lock your profile down so that anyone searching can not get into the “meat” of your profile and will only see a small portion.

Twitter

The most misunderstood application on the social bandwagon.  Twitter is alike a giant chat room where you can tell people what you’re doing, ask for help, offer help, tell people about a cool website/project, and just catch up.  As you become more known for something, people will tend to follow you because they think you’ll talk about that so keep things like that in mind as you begin to twitter.  Twitter is more conversational than blogging, and more interactive than Facebook or LinkedIn.  It requires that you participate.  You have to both listen and speak.  If you don’t speak, no one ever hears you.  If you don’t listen then no one speaks to you.

When using Twitter for the sake of personal branding you’ll want to make sure your tweets focus on whatever it is you are attempting to brand yourself for.  This means keeping the personal tweets (what you’re eating, where you are at, what you’re doing) to a minimum.  This also means “re-tweeting” other posts that have to do with the area you’re trying to brand yourself with.  Once again, I’m a bad example of this, but even I still get questions from friends about how to do things on occasion.

Conclusion

Personal branding is one part focus and several parts putting yourself out there for the world to find you.  You can be well known and respected in your field but if people can’t find you, there is very little point.  Putting yourself out there apart from your blog makes it easier to directly communicate with those you know and those you will meet.

Next week, we’re going to take a look at public events as a way to help build your personal brand.

Posted in Consulting Consultants | Tagged , | 2 Comments

links for 2009-02-05

Posted in Daily Links | Comments Off on links for 2009-02-05

links for 2009-02-04

Posted in Daily Links | Comments Off on links for 2009-02-04

Buying an HDTV: LCD & Plasma

Last week we looked at 720p versus 1080p resolutions with regards to high definition television (HDTV).  This week we’re going to look at the two more popular display technologies available to the consumer today.  Yep, today’s discussion is going to be about LCD and Plasma technologies.

Plasma

We will start with the plasma technology since it is the older technology.  When you start looking at televisions people will generally push you towards the LCD displays because over the last couple of years they have become more popular due to their size and resolution (it was hard to find a 1080p plasma that was larger than 36”-40”).  This is no longer the case.  These days you can find plasma displays that rival LCD size and resolution and generally at cheaper prices.

Some things to consider when you look at the plasma televisions is that they will have smoother refresh rates, better viewing angles, and better overall pictures.  The downside is that they are generally heavier (which can make them harder to mount), can get something called image retention, and can have really reflective screens.

The reflective screen is not a big deal if you can control the lighting situation for the room.  With newer and higher end plasmas, the percentage on image retention is pretty much nil.  And the extra weight isnt really that big of deal as long as you take it into account when setting up the mount.

LCD

The LCD technology with regards to televisions has become incredibly popular over the last couple of years, reaching a point where they have been outselling plasmas for at least a year.  With LCD, you can get larger screen sizes than you can with plasma but at the moment, both stop at right around the 65 inch mark.

Some advantages to the LCD technology is the brighter screen works well in bright rooms, the screens are generally less reflective, and there are more LCD models that will do the 1080p/24 true cinema frame rate when compared to plasmas.  The downsides however can be pretty steep, the biggest two are viewing angle and motion blur.  Viewing angle is when you try to view the panel from any angle other than straight on.  moving to the side will cause the image to lose its punch.  Also, motion blur is/can be an issue depending on what you are watching.

When shopping for an LCD, you’ll notice some of them say “120hz” and what this is, is a way to combat motion blur.  You can look at this wikipedia article on “Flickr Free” to get a better understanding of what is going on with this and how it works.  Essentially it uses trickery to try and eliminate motion blur.  Common consensus though is that Plasma handles motion better than LCD.

So Which One to Get

Here are some things to consider when picking which of these technologies to go with for your HDTV purchase.  If you can control the lighting in your viewing room, Plasma is a really good way to go.  The less ambient light in the room the better.  If you’re in a bright room (lots of windows, lights always on regardless of time of day, etc) then you’ll want to focus on the LCD technology.

If you have to go LCD, I would recommend that you look at something with the 120hz technology to help fight the potential motion blur that could occur.  But, keep in mind that if the source has blur in it, it won’t matter what TV you have because the blur is in the source and the television will display what it receives from that source.

Another thing to consider is seating.  If there will be people sitting to the side and viewing from an angle.  Not all LCDs handle this very well, especially once they are made to not me so bright.  Plasmas handle this better as well but if you sit at a bad angle both don’t really do well.

Finally, you’ll want to consider the length of time between television purchases.  Most plasmas today have a lifespan of around 85,000-100,000 hours.  What does that mean?  Well lets say that a TV is rated for 50,000 hours, then it will take 17 years for the TV to reach what’s known as “half-life” when the picture will be only half as bright as when you first bought the TV (my understanding of this or my math could be off here, if this is the case please feel free to correct me in the comments and I’ll make edits).  So that’s just something to keep in mind.

Next Week

Now that we have discussed the pros and cons of the LCD and plasma technologies, next week we will touch on the alternate display technologies like DLP, OLED, and projection.  We’re just going to hit the high points of each and weigh the pros and cons.

Posted in Technology, Television | Tagged | 4 Comments

America & Foreign Oil

Now that Obama has taken office, there is a lot of talk about what he’ll do with his energy policies.  One such thing that was said during his campaign (both my him and those that voted for him) is the now common phrase that “American needs to cut it’s dependency on foreign oil” and while I agree, these same people are the ones arguing that we shouldn’t drill on American land for oil we’ve found.

Just so the record is straight, I am all for reducing our dependency on not just foreign oil but oil as a whole.  I think that America should be on the forefront of alternative fuel technologies and be working steadily and quickly to move our vehicles, power plants, and other things that run on fossil fuels to alternative fuel sources.

But here is what I don’t understand.  the same people who say that we shouldn’t drill where we know there is oil are the same people crying for us to cut our dependency on foreign oil.  Now call me crazy, but wouldn’t drilling for our own oil on our own land do exactly what these people want?  In the past, when I have mentioned this people usually say “well, we should just cut our dependency on oil and that doesn’t help that at all” and while they are correct, they are trying to solve too many problems at once.

See here’s what I think most of these people don’t realize.  It’s going to cost money 1) conduct research on alternate fuel technologies and then it is going 2) cost money to convert everything over too those alternative sources.  Also, while these technologies are being researched, what are we going to run these cars, power plants, houses, etc on?  We have to keep what’s already out there going and that means we need oil.  I have a car that currently runs just fine on good ol’ fashion gasoline.  I’m not going to buy a new car just because ones with new fuel types exist.  My car runs fine and I don’t really want a car payment right now.  So unless the government is going to give me the money to purchase a car that uses a new/alternative fuel source I’m not buying one anytime soon.

Our current need for fuel requires oil, so that need is not going away anytime soon.  We can research alternative fuels and start integrating, but we have to solve one problem at a time.  We either need a) cut our dependency on foreign oil (which means drilling for our own) or b) contine to depend on foreign oil while work towards using more alternative fuel sources.  You can’t cut our dependency on foreign oil without finding someway to maintain the oil supply the our current way of life.  Alternative fuels just aren’t quite there yet.

Posted in Commentary, Politics | Tagged , | 4 Comments

links for 2009-01-31

Posted in Daily Links | Comments Off on links for 2009-01-31